Saturday, August 22, 2026

Star Wars and Daoism: The Real Life Parallel to The Force

 Within the modern cultural paradigm, there is perhaps no better allegorical representation of spirituality than the concept of the Force from Star Wars. A series renowned for its representation of spirituality, George Lucas himself states that the point of his anthology was the creation of a modern mythology which demonstrated man's relation with ultimate reality. While the Force does not reflect a deity or religion specifically, it was intended to function as an allegorical substrate for the central metaphysical paradigm common to all religions: man’s relation with the all-pervasive, invisible “something” that permeates all aspects of our lives and existence.


Though the Force is not indicative of a specific religion, the analogous nature of the Force is parallel to the cosmologies present in religious schools of Eastern conception. Indeed, it presents an ontology that is particularly indicative of the Dao (Tao) from Chinese schools of spiritual philosophy. In fact, had George Lucas not proclaimed a generalization of the Force’s religious juxtaposition, one could say that the Force, and by extension Star Wars, were allegorical substrates for the movement of Daoism itself.


With this understanding in mind, this post will serve as an analysis juxtaposing between the nature of the Force and its relation to inhabitants of the galaxy, and that of the Dao and its proclaimed relation to reality. From there, we can gather the centralized message of these two systems of thought and see how the centralized, underlying message may be applicable in all our lives.


                     The Nature of The Force



The Force is the energy field that binds all things in the galaxy together. It is produced by all life in the form of the Living Force that feeds back to the abstract Cosmic Force, which in turn recycles energy back to the sustainment of the Living Force. While every organism had a place in the Force, it constitutes the grand structure of all life in the galaxy, permeating every organism present. Constituting the collective of all life, the Force was often talked about in agentic terms, being described as having a “will” and orienting towards the good of all life. Be that as it may, it was inaccurate to see the Force as a “God” or “spirit.” What is more accurate is to see the Force as the manifestation of ultimate reality, as it represents the holistic system of the galaxy, all life within it and the interactions between each individual.


The will of the Force is a reference frequently found within the Star Wars mythology. As stated, the Force actualized its will through all life. Manifesting within destiny, the Force orients all events so that all is subject to the Force’s will and flows in the direction ideal for all life. Though all were subject to this will, a select few individuals were particularly in tune with the Force, being able to sense it on a conscious level, and manifesting a variety of supernatural abilities through connection with the Force. Several organizations arose in response to these abilities, providing teachings on the Force’s nature, its will, and how specialized relationships with the Force ought to be utilized. The most famous of these organizations were the Jedi and Sith respectively.


                The (Two) Aspects of the Force



Any fan of Star Wars will be immediately familiar with its two aspects: the light side and the dark side. The light side of the Force is associated with positive states such as happiness, love, kindness, selflessness, altruism and compassion, or alternatively simple peace and tranquility. The most famous practitioners were the Jedi, who used it for knowledge and defense.


In contrast, the dark side of the Force was associated with raw emotions such as fear, anger, hatred, aggression, selfishness and unrestrained passion. It was seen as a quick and seductive, albeit easier path than the light side and was a constant source of temptation. While many groups were associated with the dark side, the most famous were that of the Sith throughout the majority of canonical Star Wars.


When many fans look at these two aspects of the Force, they typically view these methods as being the proverbial “yin and yang” of the force; that is, both sides of the force exist equally in conjunction with a greater whole and are both naturally occurring, and thus healthy to tap into. Indeed, the expanded canon of Star Wars includes such groups as the Grey Jedi, so named for their beliefs that proper balance in the force is obtained via equilibrium between the light side and the dark side. In fact, the Grey Jedi code itself claims explicitly that there is no light nor dark side, but rather the force as a whole.


While this conceptualization contains some kernels of truth, it is based on a fundamental misconception on the nature of the dark side and balance in the force. What does seem to be correct is the notion that the force is one grand, all-encompassing reality that seems to transcend such notions as light or dark. The core distinction actually lies in how one chooses to relate to the force. Let us examine in greater detail.


As mentioned, the light side is aligned with positive states of mind, or emotional neutrality. It is associated with altruism, selflessness and caring about other people. The force, being the guide and result of all life in the galaxy, consists of the energy that guides the totality of organisms in the galaxy. The films have been clear that the light side is how the force naturally exists in the galaxy. Practitioners of the light are not tapping into a specific aspect of the force, but are rather moving in conjunction with the force as it naturally flows throughout the galaxy. To use the light side of the force is to move as one in harmony with the force. To let it flow through you and move as a single unit. In fact, the original star wars trilogy does not give rise to the term “light side” even once. This is because there is no light side. The natural state of the force is the light side and to practice immersing yourself in the light is to flow with the nature of the force as it, and you, were meant to be.


In contrast, the dark side of the force is not a different aspect of, or malevolent counterpart to the light, but is in fact a corruption of the natural state of the force. Rather than flow as one with the force, the dark side is the result of the use of emotions to manipulate the force. In other words, the dark side is what occurs when a practitioner abuses their connection with the force so that they may bend its power to their own will. Rather than functioning in tandem with the force, the dark side is manipulating the force to function in service to your own selfishness.


For obvious reasons, balance is not obtained via maintaining an even ground between the dark and the light. Balance in the force involves cementing yourself purely in the light and not abusing your connection through the dark. While the dark side of the force arises through selfish emotions, such as anger or hate, the question is not about whether one should feel these states, as it is impossible to control your subjective state of mind. No, what one must do is control how they react to these states of mind. While one may rely on their anger to tap into the dark side and destroy an enemy, this is the equivalent of trying to fix your computer by hitting it. Instead, one should use their anger in a productive manner to practice patience and understanding, merely responding in assertiveness and self-defense to an opponent. While a practitioner may tap into both the light and the dark, this is not equivalent to obtaining balance.


While I shall discuss the force at length in a future post, what we can conclude now is that one should exist in tandem with the natural flow of existence and not seek to manipulate one’s circumstances through selfishness. Star Wars is a cautionary tale of where selfishness brings its practitioner, as nothing built on that power can last.


While an entire post could be written on the symbolism of the force, we now must turn our attention to the closest philosophical concept that the force represents; the Dao. First, let us examine what exactly Daoism is, then we shall turn our attention to why it’s relevant to the force.


                                     Daoism 

                                                            Chinese character for "Dao"

Daoism (Taoism) is a Chinese philosophical/religious movement that was founded in the sixth century B.C.E. A loose movement of thought with no official governing body, it eventually became popularized by the philosopher Laozi in his sole work, the Dao De Jing. The existence of Laozi is controversial, with credit for the Dao De Jing believed to be attributed to multiple authors of the Warring States period. Later, Chinese philosopher Zhuangzi further contributed to Daoism within the title Zhuangzi. While articulated by these philosophers, it is not intrinsic to any one individual, existing in tandem with various aspects of Chinese culture and even language.


That being established, we now must ask, what is Daoism? As the name implies, it is a movement of belief systems that regards reverence for the Dao ( ).  Immediately, we have a problem, as the Dao is completely intangible. As Laozi states: “the Dao that can be uttered is not the eternal Dao. The name that can be named is not the eternal name.” This is ironic, as Laozi just admitted that the Dao can never be understood, only articulated indirectly, then proceeds to write a book on the subject. While this may seem paradoxical, further revelation of Daoism may reveal why this is the case.


As implied, the Dao is an ineffable concept; only being understood indirectly through description which fails to accurately articulate the essence. Be that as it may, attempts have been made to gain a grasp on the concept. First, the Dao does not translate directly with any word in English, though its closest proximity translates as “the Way”, though it may also be translated as “the Path” or “the Method.” Throughout the Dao De Jing, it is encapsulated as “the way” by which reality unfolds, being the source of the "ten-thousand things.” In other words, the Dao is the ineffable source from which all arises and that is responsible for the expression of the rules of reality. What’s interesting is that Dao as such is not a concept exclusive to Daoism, being prominent in Chinese culture. Everything is said to have their dao. The dao of a knife is to cut; the dao of a blacksmith is to forge; the dao of a river is to flow. What is distinct here is precisely that the Daoists follow “the” Dao. The term here is applicable to reality’s expression itself and is generalized to this ineffable origin, “itself never doing, but through it, all is done.”


While the Dao may be that which is venerated by the Daoists, it is not accurate to think of the Dao as a God or other incorporeal agent. The Dao is not an entity in the sense of having a will or cognition. The Dao is simply the natural unfolding through the ever-present flow of reality. While the Dao cannot be encapsulated, it can be experienced through the attention of the practitioner. Dao De Jing served as a critic of intellectualism at the time, and as such should not be seen as a text for mere understanding. Instead, the advice of the Dao De Jing, much as with the Dao itself, should be experienced. While the Dao cannot be understood, encountering it and flowing with it leads to its understanding. It cannot be grasped intellectually yet is constantly present. We merely take it for granted as it is so basic to reality’s expression that we fail to notice it. Just as one may accustom to a novel scent present, we accustom to the Dao as it is so ever-present that we fail to notice its manifestation.


While the previous description may seem contradictory, the Dao De Jing is a book that is rife in contradiction. This is likely intentional on the part of the authors, as it plays into the Dao’s ineffable nature. As stated, Daoism is meant to be experienced and through their understanding of the Dao arises. The name falls short in explanation of the essence of the thing. This is not to say that the Dao is beyond understanding, it is simply to say that words cannot fully articulate the concept. Indeed, Laozi himself, as stated, admits that the Dao that can be spoken is not the eternal Dao. He later references the ineffable unfolding of reality that is responsible for the ever-present change of the universe, stating “I know not what it is; I call it Dao.”


Gaining perspective on this, it is clearly established that we may never have a satisfactory definition of the Dao. However, scholars have taken to defining it as “the ultimate manifestation of reality and everything in it.” Like a river, the Dao is responsible for the ever-present change of reality, bringing it to and fro and gently allowing for natural transition to occur. All is subservient to the Dao, though the Dao itself never acts. If one contemplates, it may seem obvious how the Force is related to such a concept.


                        Yin & Yang (太极图 )



A well established concept at this point, yin and yang describe inseparable yet opposing forces of nature that compose the universe. What is less known is that yin and yang originally made reference to the sunny and overcast sides of a hill. The side encased in sunlight was said to be in yang while the overshadowed side was said to be in yin. It was from here that yin and yang were depicted as the ebb and flow of the universe, whereas seemingly opposing states as masculine/feminine, sharp/blunt, light/dark and good/evil give rise to each other. Indeed, the Dao De Jing gives rise to this notion through establishing the necessary opposition of the concepts to give rise to such conceptualizations themselves. The most notable example is in chapter 2 of the Dao De Jing, wherein Laozi states:

When everyone in the world sees beauty,

Then ugly exists.

When everyone sees good,

Then bad exists.


Therefore:

What is and what is not created by each other.

Difficult and easy complement each other.

Tall and short shape each other.

High and low rest on each other.

Voice and tone blend with each other.

First and last follow each other.


So, the sage acts by doing nothing,

Teaches without speaking,

Attends all things without making claim on them,

Works for them without making them dependent,

Demands no honor for his deed.

Because he demands no honor,

He will never be dishonored.



                                       Wu-Wei (無為)


In accordance with living with the Dao, the central emphasis is on allowing nature to take its course. Human activity need not be excessive to achieve results, as the Dao will flow to its proper destination naturally. In accordance with that nature, humans may strive to flow in tandem with the Dao as a result of Wu-Wei.


Wu-Wei is a concept that does not have a direct translation in English, though its closest proximity translates to “non-action” or “non-effort.” While neither of these fully encapsulate the concept, non-effort strikes me as a better translation for a specific reason: Wu-Wei is not the same as passivity. While sounding reminiscent of non-effort to the English ear, what Wu-Wei actually advocates for is living in tandem with the Dao. While one should still act in the world, they should not use their actions to force an outcome that they desire. Instead, one should act in parallel with the flow of things, knowing when to act and when to not act. One should still orient towards outcomes that they desire, but they should not allow this proper desire to dictate the outcome that must be achieved. In English, this is typically encapsulated as “going with the flow.”


A better conceptualization of Wu-Wei actually translates to the paradoxical “Wei-Wu-Wei,” or “action-non-action.” The implication of the titular concept is of doing not-doing, though once again, we must not confuse this concept with passivity. Instead, we should act in accordance with nature, orienting ourselves to follow the principle of the Dao, which functions as the flowing guide to achieve what we desire.


A relevant example here may be seen in a man desiring a new relationship. In attempting to attract the object of his desire, he may very well try to force the connection to develop through proper speech and action. However, in forcing his will on events, the connection will not develop of its proper nature, as this is equivalent to forcing a plant to grow by pulling on it.


                 How Daoism Relates to The Force


Both the Force and the Dao share the commonality of being the ineffable, ultimate principle of reality by which everything flows and unfolds in the cosmos, “itself undoing, but through which everything is done.” Both of these ideologies advocate for balance and flowing in conjunction with this principle as a way of achieving balance, peace, wisdom and harmony. 


                       The Light Side


As mentioned, the light side represents the way the force naturally flows throughout the galaxy. It is the state of the force responsible for the growth and harmony of all life. Practitioners of the light side are those who use their connection with the Force to flow with it, orienting themselves to exist in their proper place within the Force. Allowing the Force to flow through them, light side practitioners use their connection for the embetterment of all life and for preserving peace and balance while keeping the dark side in check. Again, this is not to say that negative emotions such as anger are unnatural, it is merely to keep them in balance in accordance with a wise and healthy life.


The light side can be seen as congruent with the Dao. All things flow in accordance with the proper volition of the Dao which is responsible for the emergence, form, nature and connection between all things. The Dao is the principle of underlying reality by which all emerges and unfolds. Similar to the Cosmic and Living Force’s mentioned, the Dao contains its true, ineffable nature while simultaneously being understood through its manifestation into everyday life and via our very own experience.


To live a balanced life via a “light side” understanding is to practice Wu-Wei, by definition no longer orienting towards selfish desire but simply by allowing action to flow naturally. While desire is normal and should be sought, it should not be done so at the expense of natural, continuous congruency with the nature of things. Just as the Dao naturally manifests in the growth of a blade of grass, the Dao shall flow naturally through, say, the desired job interview or developing attraction. Wu-Wei is to act in congruency of these things, not acting without intention but without force of personal will. In this way, we can achieve our potential via flowing with the Dao and recognizing our place as it and within it. This is the real world Jedi path that allows one to live a life of wisdom and balance.


                            The Dark Side


In contrast, falling to the dark side means falling out of balance in pursuit of one’s selfish goals. The dark side provides the practitioner with an immediate swell of power granting them the ability to manipulate circumstances to be as they want it to be. Having access to this power grants them the desire to pursue goals for themselves and manipulate events to their own limited perspective. However, this is a corrupting path as it involves bending reality to be as you desire it. While it does grant short victories, it leads to the fear that the benefits received will eventually pass away. Such fear leads one to cling to their benefits rather than truly living. The overall defensive attitude that this results in leads to an anger directed to circumstance and people that can never be fully controlled, leading one down the path towards hate, and from there, suffering. Yoda warns us that the dark side is not truly more powerful, but rather “quicker, easier, more seductive.” While it certainly seems more powerful, and is in the short term, it is ultimately corrupting. Nothing built on that power can last. While pursuing vengeance on a wrong doing grants one power to dominate and destroy an enemy, it keeps one locked in a cycle of anger and hurt. Any pleasure derived from such a victory will be shallow and empty. In contrast, to forgive is less seductive and certainly seems less powerful, but overall leads to a peace resulting from liberation of one’s burden.


In Daoism, a variety of dark creatures are mentioned. Demons make an appearance, being described as Qi that have fallen out of balance. But perhaps the most well known is that of the jiangshi, or the “chinese hopping vampire” (though it is technically a type of ghost). A jiangshi arises from an impairment of the soul's transition into the afterlife. Daoists believe the soul contains two constituent parts, the hun () that controls the intellect and consciousness, and the po ( ) responsible for biological function and instinct. When a body is not buried under native soil or dies in a violent or tragic manner, the po (which normally rots with the body) can remain in the corpse while the hun passes on. The result is a cadaver, rigid in its movements from rigor mortis, that operates solely on instinct and feeds off the Qi of the living. Essentially, a jiangshi is a spiritual glitch, producing an eternally moving carriage with no driver, resulting from imbalance between the souls of the corpse.



                        Conclusion


The majority of religious and spiritual traditions present reality as having an underlying principle, be it God, life essence, energy, matter or even the cosmos itself. The Force from Star Wars was created to represent that underlying principle that all these traditions look to, itself proclaiming sovereignty over none of them. For reasons we have just seen, Daoism arguably represents the Force closer than any other, through its metaphysical imperative and advocation for how one ought to live.


While the majority of people wrestle with existence in an attempt to produce the desired outcome, Star Wars advocates for flowing as one with the Force and resisting the temptation of the dark side in an attempt to live a well-rounded and balanced life. This is quite parallel to Daoism’s concept of Wu-Wei and emphasis on not tinkering with the Dao, as all things will eventually be done through it. While many will debate over the legitimacy of either philosophy, it is impossible to deny the thought-provoking nature that both ideas entail.



If you enjoy this content, want to see more and wish for faster publishing times, please consider supporting me on Patreon. This will allow me to professionalize this blog and increase the quality of my output, as well as its velocity. Also, follow me on Facebook for further updates. Thank you for the view.


Tuesday, July 14, 2026

16 Random Facts

 Important Notice: Reality Encyclopedia is being converted into a podcast and a youtube channel! While posts shall continue, please keep an eye open for its emerging audio platform. Links shall be posted here upon first upload. Thank you kindly!

  1. The first form of parchment paper was invented in Mesopotamia in 4000 B.C.E. This form of parchment paper was made from animal skins and used for writing and wrapping. The organized form of parchment paper became popularized in the 3rd century Greece from manufacturers in Pergamon.

  2. The brain processes words through a dynamic network of specialized, interconnected regions that decode sounds and letters, extract meaning and integrate context to language in real time.

  3. Emotional attachment, unresolved feelings or lack of closure can contribute to difficulty moving on after a relationship has ended.

  4. Sometimes, people feel the need to poop when they are anxious. This is caused by the fight-or-flight hormones serotonin, epinephrine and cortisol stimulating gut-motility, which may cause spasms in the colon and contribute to the need to defecate.

  5. Stimulant drugs help people with A.D.H.D. The disorder is associated with low levels of dopamine and norepinephrine. Stimulants work by blocking reuptake of these neurotransmitters or enhancing their release, contributing to the focus normally absent in A.D.H.D.

  6. Scotland's national animal is the unicorn, a mythical animal never seen in reality.

  7. There is no nationwide rule that demands all police use body cameras.

  8. Strawberries are technically not berries. A berry is a fleshy fruit that develops from a single ovary of a single flower with seeds embedded in the pericarp that ripens into edible flesh. On the other hand, strawberries enlarged receptacles rather than the ovary itself. It is actually the seeds in the strawberry which are the actual fruits.

  9. The risk of mold increases with a humidity index over sixty percent.

  10. Alcohol is the second most widely used recreational substance after caffeine.

  11. Metaphysics is the study of the nature of reality.

  12. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are diseases caused by misfolded proteins (known as “prions”) that leave spongelike holes in the brain, leading to inevitable death.

  13. Matter is any substance that has mass and takes up space by having volume.

  14. Nuclear war would lead to mass nuclear winter from columns of smoke rising from firestorms from major urban areas. This would block sunlight for five years and reduce global temperatures by 7 degrees celsius.

  15. Psychological trauma can lead to pronounced identity diffusion.

  16. Infected Mushroom is one of the best selling musical groups in Israel history in terms of domestic and international sales.

Thursday, July 2, 2026

Differentiating Between Hardwood and Softwood Trees

 Important Notice: Reality Encyclopedia is being converted into a podcast and a youtube channel! While posts shall continue, please keep an eye open for its emerging audio platform. Links shall be posted here upon first upload. Thank you kindly!



While my readers have likely been famished for a new post, I have been busy with productivity, bureaucracy and migration to audio platforms. Though larger posts have not been present in some time, rough copies of materials are being prepared for your curiosity. For now, I shall attempt to provide some shorter material until said projects have been completed. This post reflects a recent curiosity of mine.


Trees. Trillions of them are said to exist on the planet earth. They are relatively recent on the plantae evolutionary history, though they have had plenty of time to evolve and prosper on our planet. Unsurprisingly, trees come in several variations and thousands of different species. While we shall not dive deep into tree typology as of today, a notable binary state exists within tree categorization, that being between hardwoods and softwoods.


Hardwood trees are angiospermic trees which are flowering trees containing seeds produced by an ovary encased in the flowers and contained within an envelope such as a fruit or nut. This coating allows for protection of the seeds, ensuring their survival until such time as the fruit is disturbed by a hungry animal. From there, the seeds are implanted into the earth, ensuring the growth of a new tree. Such trees tend to have stereotypical leaves which are shed in the autumn months in which their nutrients are syphoned for the tree's winter dormancy.


In contrast, softwood trees are more ancient on the evolutionary ladder, being gymnospermic in reproductive strategy, and thus having “naked” seeds. Such trees are typically evergreen, having needle-like leaves that are not shed by the year's end. These trees tend to reproduce via the transmission of their seeds onto the wind, seeking contact with an ovary from another tree. These seeds tend to form on the surface of the tree's leaves, forming cones in the process.. Such trees are typically evergreen, having needle-like leaves that are not shed by the year's end.



If you enjoy my content and want to see more at a higher quality, please consider donating to my patreon. Please follow me on facebook for further updates. Stay tuned for updates regard the Reality Encyclopedia podcast!


Saturday, April 25, 2026

The Christian Canon Series Part 3: Baptists

    


                                                                  Credit: Redeemed Zoomer

 Christianity, being the world's largest religion, presents with a multitude of variability in its beliefs, rituals and practices. In these differences, it is difficult to discern where to begin in our analysis of the “canonical” denomination. However, as covered in the second post of this series, we shall start with protestantism due to its vast heterogeneity in beliefs, recency of development and relative lack of proclamation for being the “one true church.” Furthermore, it is common, though not universal, for protestants to unite under their commonalities, the central being that the bible is more important than the church. In that understanding, churches may still unify spiritually despite the differences in canonical interpretation. With this heterogeneity, there is more that may be said about protestantism than the so-called "ecclesiastical" denominations (e.g, catholic and orthodox). As such, it seems prudent that we tackle this vast diversity before moving on to denominations of simpler generalizability.


While we may begin our discussion with a multitude of protestant denominations, one of great popularity, especially within the United States is that of the baptist church. With its frequency of appearance in news headlines as well as general awareness within the modern zeitgeist, we shall discuss this denomination due to its familiarity. Furthermore, Christians who identify as “non-denominational” are truly baptist in terms of their beliefs (for reasons we shall discuss shortly). With these explanations covered, we shall officially discuss our exploration of the Christians canon, beginning with baptism.


Baptism


Baptists are so named due to their differentiation in the practice of baptism, seeing it as a voluntary, personal act, referred to as “believers baptism” as they do not believe in the baptism of infants. While other denominations claim that baptism is how you become Christian, baptists believe that it is how you proclaim that you are Christian, marking baptism as an individual choice representing your rebirth in Christ.




Beliefs


Before continuing with the specifics of baptist theology, it is necessary first to establish that the baptists generally come under one of two theological substrates: Reformed baptists who uphold a Calvinistic theology, and General baptists who are proponents of Arminian theology. While these two theological schools deserve analyses in their own right, what is important for this summary is the difference in views of salvation. Calvinists believe that Jesus died for the select few who God has predetermined shall be saved, while Arminians uphold that Christ died for all and that salvation is actualized through establishing faith in Christ. Though this variation exists within baptism as a whole, general baptists are the most common, and thus baptism will be analyzed through an Arminian lens in terms of its validity. Furthermore, predestination is the only aspect of Calvinist theology that reformed baptists accept, and thus they are not “reformed” in the true sense of Calvinist denominations. Thus, praise or criticisms for the denomination as a whole may not apply to specific groups of baptism. Please put this into consideration when speculating on this post.


What distinguishes baptism from other denominations is the presence of six centralized doctrines:

  1. Supreme authority of the scriptures. While protestants in general claim that the bible has more authority than the church, baptists claim that the bible is the unique and infallible authority of the Christian faith (Sola Scriptura).

  2. Believers baptism: The most conspicuous feature. All members of the church should be individual believers and be baptized via full immersion in proclamation of this belief.

  3. The church should only be composed of those who truly believe in the Christian doctrine.

  4. Equality of Christians in all rights of the church. All believers are equal in the eyes of God and nobody occupies a higher “sanctified” position.

  5. Independence of the local church. Baptist churches lack a centralized authority and operate under the unification of the congregation.

  6. Separation of church and state. This reflects the concept of seeking a personal relationship. One should only be Christian via personal choice to demonstrate true belief in Jesus.


While not a central characteristic, another important notion of baptism is congregational sovereignty and the priesthood of believers. This relates to the individual relationship with Christ. Believers do not need an intermediary and each individual is free to pursue his own relationship.


A central thread to the doctrines of baptism is their prominent individualism. This is reflected in their theology, as they see Christianity as having a personal relationship with Jesus. Logically, baptists do not see the institutional church as having much importance (what is dubbed “low church"). While the church is useful in its unification of believers and the establishment of the community, God’s church on earth results from the congregation of believers and their personal orientation towards faith. Thus, the church itself is of no importance to personal salvation. All that is necessary is Christ's sacrifice for your sins. Baptists believe that the church itself lacks necessity for salvation and does not place emphasis on the church for fear that believers may mistake it as the source of salvation. Furthermore, emphasis should not be placed on believers' baptism, as this is merely a symbolic act demonstrating one’s new faith in Christ, and good works should not be seen as a means of salvation. The only thing that grants salvation was Christ's sacrifice for you. As such, all focus should be placed on Him.


The bible is considered the sole authority for baptists, encompassing the old and new testament; believing it to be inspired by God and being without error. The authority of the bible is a central tenant of baptism and is referred to as “sole scriptora" or the sole authority of scripture. As a reflection of 2nd Timothy: 16-17, baptists believe in the conversion of all nations into Christendom, leading to remarkable missionary work throughout the years. As an extension of the bible being the sole authority, baptists believe that each individual has a personal responsibility to orient themselves towards God (sole competency). The justification for forgiveness of sin lies exclusively within a believer's faith (sole fide).


While baptism is the central sacrament within the baptist church (though it is considered an ordinance as baptism is not seen as a means for salvation) the Lord’s Supper is the second sacrament present. Baptists will often perform the Lord’s Supper weekly, though it is not regarded with the same reverence as some other denominations. The practice is acknowledged to be merely a symbolic act, representative of Christ’s final encounter with his disciples and recognition of his sacrifice. Christ is not believed to be received within the ritual.


In common with other Christians, baptists are monotheistic, believing only in one God. Like the majority of denominations, they are trinitarian, believing that God encompasses three persons: Father; Son and Holy Spirit. Each person is distinct and independent, yet one-hundred percent God in their own right, despite encompassing the one God. Baptists emphasize God’s holiness, sovereignty and love and are theistic, believing God is the creator and sustainer of all things. To understand God, baptists believe that His nature is outlined in the bible, further cementing it as the ultimate authority for faith and practice. Perhaps somewhat differently to other denominations, baptists believe that God is approachable through adoration and prayer and that it is possible to have a personal relationship with Him through these practices.


Baptists believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God and the second person of the trinity, being fully human and fully divine. Christ is the means of atonement for sin, as His sacrifice is the only means of salvation. Salvation is normally seen as available to all and is a gift of God’s grace, and is received through faith in Christ.


Because baptists believe that baptism is a representation of rebirth in Christ, they commonly accept the “once saved, always saved” doctrine. In other words, if one is truly reborn in Christ then they will never truly fall away from His grace. Should one deconvert at a later date, they were never truly reborn to begin with.


Baptism has the five sola’s in common with all other protestant groups. Baptists believe that salvation is via grace alone (sola grata) through faith alone (sola fide) in Christ alone (sola christus) according to the bible alone (sola scriptura) through God’s glory alone (soli deo gloria). What differentiates baptists is the emphasis on the central importance of sola scriptura. For example, Lutherans value scripture as the sole infallible authority, but church authority, though lesser, is still of importance. However, baptists put authority solely on the scriptures. For them, if it is not found in the scriptures, it is not necessary for salvation and therefore not important.


While baptists are a very politically involved denomination, they ironically believe in separation between church and state. While it is the desire of baptists to bring Christendom to the nations, the central motive is for all to come of their own volition.


Worship


While baptists are a low church denomination, they do participate in church service. Communion generally includes praise to God, Biblical sermons and periodic eucharist participation. Traditional or contemporary hymns are typically sung as part of worship. Prayer meetings are often held during the week as a means of community gathering and biblical study. Services are often held for children as a means of facilitating gospel comprehension in the young.

The service mentioned typically functions as an exposition of the scriptures and contains extemporaneous, rather than set prayers. The ultimate authority of the church is Christ who lays his church within the foundational body of believers.


Church architecture is typically contemporary with the Latin cross being the only symbol present. This is reflective of the church's lack of institutional relevance within baptist tradition.

As mentioned, baptists practice “believers baptism” reflecting total submersion in water as a personal choice to be reborn in Christ. This act is considered an ordinance, not a sacrament, as it is not necessary for salvation, though it is symbolic of one’s declaration of being Christian. The second ordinance lies in the eucharist. Once again, this is not considered a sacrament, as it is not necessary for salvation. The point of the eucharist is for symbolic honoration of Christ's sacrifice on the cross and reverence of his last encounter with the disciples. Typically bread and grape juice are used and represent the body and blood of Christ, though He is not considered to be physically or spiritually within the elements. While Christ's sacrifice is generally considered to be for everybody, the eucharist is typically reserved for those who have undergone voluntary baptism.


The worship services are often simple. Typically they are centered around worship, prayer and singing. Service typically discusses a passage of scripture rather than scripture in its entirety. Singing hymns are often central with congregational singing being the most common.



Positive Elements


To begin, we can affirm that baptism is a Paulinistic denomination of Christianity due to its acceptance of the Nicene creed that defines these denominations, in particular relating to the nature of Christ. As with these other groups, baptists agree that Christ was fully human and fully God; that He was born of the virgin Mary; that He died for our sins; that He rose from the dead; that He ascended into heaven and that He will return to judge the living and the dead. These are the essentials for Paulinistic Christian groups, identifying baptism as non-heretical within this doctrine.


Christianity is quite clear on its doctrine of God seeking a relationship with humanity. Baptism is a faith that offers that luxury, imploring others to take the initiative towards faith and rebirth in Christ. Furthermore, its emphasis on only believers being present within the church is a logical extension of Christian belief. As Christ's sacrifice is emphasized in terms of belief in Him, this is a characteristic that baptism seems to be correct on.


The baptist position on the eucharist has positive elements. As mentioned, the baptists do not believe that the bread and (generally) grape juice literally transform into the body, blood, essence, spirit or divinity of Christ. Instead, it is seen as an ordinance that is merely symbolic and not a necessary means of salvation, but serves as an example and reverence towards Christ's sacrifice. Logically, this position is easier to defend, as explanation is needed for the mechanisms of transubstantiation. While some may conclude that the cause is a miracle of God, you must nonetheless explain the mechanism by which this happens. Because we have no empirical or logical evidence of this occurring, as well as a lack of a cause-and-effect explanation, the baptist account seems to run more parallel to reality.


Should the bible be the inherent word of God, then it is a positive note as to how baptists pay particular salience to its message. However, I would argue that within the Christian canon, sole scriptura is lacking in some fundamental theological doctrines. Nonetheless, should God be communicating with humanity through the bible, then the importance given to the bible is invariably a positive note.


Negative Elements


The first problem with baptism is its tendency to embrace Arminian theology. If Christianity is true, then there is no possibility that Arminianism is correct; the central reason being for its emphasis on Christ's universal sacrifice. Calvinistic theology understands the logic of an omnipotent, omniscient God clearer than does Arminianism in that Calvinism recognizes pre-destination. Here’s what must be understood: if an all-powerful, all-knowing God has a plan for the universe and knows everything that you are going to do before you do it, you are not free to not do what He knows you will do. Since the beginning of time, philosophers have debated whether free will exists, or if determinism is the doctrine that rules the day. Both Christians and atheists alike have used both sides of this debate as support for their own arguments and rebutting the opposition. However, in reality, while it is not clear if free will exists under the atheistic paradigm, it definitely does not under the theistic worldview. As mentioned, if the Christian God exists, we are not free to act outside of His awareness of our future actions. This not only passes determinism in intensity, but brings us into necessitarian territory. To explain briefly, necessitarianism rejects possibility; that is, everything that occurs must have occurred with no possibility of it not occurring. This differs from determinism in that determinism still acknowledges the notion of possibility. Should an omniscient God exist who has a plan for everything in the universe, therein lies no room for possibility, as everything that occurs follows necessary from God’s plan. While this criticism is not applicable to Calvinist baptists, it is a valid criticism to the denomination overall as the majority subscribe to an Arminian theology.


While personal choice to embrace Christianity has been classified as a positive note, a negative byproduct of this is its fervent individualism. While baptists see the congregation of believers as the “body of Christ” on earth, this is an ironic proposition as the whole denomination is based on a personal relationship with God. This in of itself is not negative, however, what is problematic is the further encouragement for independent interpretation of scripture. Two consequences emerge as a result of these doctrines. Firstly, baptism fails to integrate the congregation due to lack of a centralized structure. Because of this individualism, communities are merely a place for congregation but are not considered important within the context of the denomination's beliefs. It is merely about the individual rather than the collective under God’s name. Finally, the encouragement of independent interpretation will inevitably lead not only to doctrines that are incompatible with one another but to perspectives that are invariably false. Should Christianity be the true faith of the world, it is impossible that a series of contradictory theological interpretations could all be correct under the context of one theology. If there is a God who desires for a relationship with His believers, then it would only make sense that He would desire His word to be interpreted collectively and adored as a group. A God with an absolute plan and an absolute message would desire an absolute interpretation, then individual, contradictory opinions are not compatible with an objective religion.


Another issue is the separation of church and state. Let me preemphasize this with clarification: I am not an opposer of church and state separation. In my opinion, these are two distinctive modalities and should not overlap under any circumstances. Individuals should be free to have or not have a religion, and said religions acceptance should be a personal choice. However, this series is not assuming the validity of Christianity, but is meant to suggest its canonical denomination within the religions context, under the assumption that the religion is true. To that end, we are beginning with confirmation bias and proceeding from a theological, rather than a philosophical approach. While Christianity's validity will be explored in a future post, that is not the purpose of this series.


To this end, the following will likely be obvious: if the God of Christianity is the true God, why would He desire separation of church and state? Each society would be His by definition, and as such He would seek out a relationship with its inhabitants. While desiring all followers to be believers seems logical, would it not be further logical to have the state educate its citizens via religion? As God Himself desires for the world to be a theocracy under His rule, it seems a logical extension that each society should reflect that. Thus, though I agree with personal choice for the acceptance of Christianity, a life under such a God’s rule logically would not.


Another doctrine that is problematic is the “once saved, always saved” notion. This is simply not the case. Many individuals subscribe to the notion of Christianity, believing full heartedly in its tenets and obeying to the best of their abilities, yet still abandon the faith for various motives. A counterargument used for this is to claim the person was never saved to begin with, but this is hopelessly to beg the question. If they weren’t saved because they lost faith, and lost faith because they weren’t saved, we have circular reasoning that does not lead us anywhere. Furthermore, what differentiates a believer who is saved from one who is not? Why does God choose to save one believer and keep them under His arm, while allowing another to lose faith and face damnation? As we have established Calvinism as being a more valid system, we may safely conclude that God KNOWS who will be saved and who will not by nature of His omniscience and His personal choice; however, explanation must be given as to why He would abandon some believers to lost faith while permanently saving others.


Another issue with baptism is its very low church doctrine. Though valid counterarguments may be made for this, it is of this author's opinion that God seeks a communion with His followers. While this includes personal relationships, it is not at the cost of the communion. The church functions as God’s kingdom on earth, and serves as a means by which God’s congregation may commune with Him. While there seems to me nothing wrong with seeking a relationship with your God, it should not be done at the cost of the community, of which the church serves this function. As mentioned, if God has a plan for humanity, then this plan is collective by nature and is objective in its administration. As such, personal interpretation is bound to lead to error and is separative, rather than uniting in its results. While individuals should seek a relationship to God, they should also remember that Christianity is a community that serves as the congregation to God’s kingdom, meant to be actualized as a community.


Finally, we must discuss the baptist relationship with sin. If existence leads to sin as a result of humanity's fall, and baptism is the way of entering Christianity, that baby baptism makes sense under that paradigm. An infant with an infection should be prescribed antibiotics immediately, not forced to wait until adulthood to decide if it desires treatment. While personal baptism is great for declaring yourself Christian, it is not necessary for salvation and serves a symbolic value. However, if escape from sin IS necessary for salvation and baptism serves that function, then it should be administered to an infant so that they may be a child unto God before any risk of damnation is imminent. While baptists may disagree that baby baptism is necessary for salvation, I shall discuss the problems with this notion in a future denomination post.


Final Rank

Finalizing my thoughts on baptism, I rank this denomination:





While baptism has positive doctrines that every Christian should practice, there are some unfortunate problems with its theological doctrine. Baptism contains positive principles that every Christian should consider and practice, but there are not enough positive notes to consider it canon. Overall, baptism is not a bad denomination, but would not be my personal recommendation for those looking to choose a denomination.